• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Bear Stearns Fund Collapse Sends Shock Through CDOs ... PRETTY UGLY

  • Thread starter Thread starter naeron
  • Start date Start date
Joined
5/5/06
Messages
105
Points
26
Bear Stearns Fund Collapse Sends Shock Through CDOs (Update2)
By Mark Pittman
June 21 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co.'s threat to sell $800 million of mortgage securities seized from Bear Stearns Cos. hedge funds is sending shudders across Wall Street.
A sale would give banks, brokerages and investors the one thing they want to avoid: a real price on the bonds in the fund that could serve as a benchmark. The securities are known as collateralized debt obligations, which exceed $1 trillion and comprise the fastest-growing part of the bond market.
Because there is little trading in the securities, prices may not reflect the highest rate of mortgage delinquencies in 13 years. An auction that confirms concerns that CDOs are overvalued may spark a chain reaction of writedowns that causes billions of dollars in losses for everyone from hedge funds to pension funds to foreign banks. Bear Stearns, the second-biggest mortgage bond underwriter, also is the biggest broker to hedge funds.
``More than a Bear Stearns issue, it's an industry issue,'' said Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York. Hintz was chief financial officer of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the largest mortgage underwriter, for three years before becoming an analyst in 2001. ``How many other hedge funds are holding similar, illiquid, esoteric securities? What are their true prices? What will happen if more blow up?''
Shares Fall
Shares of Bear Stearns, the fifth-biggest U.S. securities firm by market value, and Merrill, the third-largest, led a decline in financial company stocks yesterday, and the perceived risk of owning their bonds jumped on concerns losses related to subprime home loans may be bigger than initially thought. Both companies are based in New York.
The perceived risk of owning corporate bonds jumped to the highest in nine months today. Contracts based on $10 million of debt in the CDX North America Crossover Index rose as much as $10,000 in early trading today to $178,500, according to Deutsche Bank AG. They retraced to $171,500 at 8:28 a.m. in New York.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox said yesterday that the agency's division of market regulation is tracking the turmoil at the Bear Stearns fund.
``Our concerns are with any potential systemic fallout,'' Cox said in an interview.
Bankers and money managers bundle securities into a CDO, dividing it into pieces with credit ratings as high as AAA. The riskiest parts have no rating because they are first in line for any losses. Investors in this so-called equity portion expect to generate returns of more than 10 percent.
Fivefold Increase
CDOs were created in 1987 by bankers at now-defunct Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., the home of one-time junk-bond king Michael Milken. Sales reached $503 billion in 2006, a fivefold increase in three years. More than half of those issued last year contained mortgages made to people with poor credit, little loan history, or high debt, according to Moody's Investors Service.
New York-based Cohen & Co. was the biggest issuer of CDOs last year. It has formed 36 CDOs since 2001, including 15 worth a total of $14 billion in 2006, according to newsletter Asset- Backed Alert.
Not since 1994 have mortgages with past due payments been so high, according to first-quarter data compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the agency that insures deposits at 8,650 U.S. banks. Lehman analysts estimated in April that the collateral backing CDOs had fallen by $25 billion.
``The big question is whether these forced liquidations represent a tipping point in the market,'' said Carl Bell, who helps manage $63 billion in fixed-income assets as head of the structured-credit team at Boston-based Putnam Investments. It ``may put pressure on other hedge funds pursuing similar strategies'' as the Bear Stearns funds, he said.
Biggest Names
The Bear Stearns funds are run by senior managing director Ralph Cioffi. One of the funds, the 10-month old High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, lost 20 percent this year, the New York Post reported. Officials at Bear Stearns and Merrill declined to disclose the losses.
The funds had borrowed at least $6 billion from the biggest names on Wall Street. Aside from Merrill, other creditors included Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. All of the firms are based in New York, except Bank of America, which is based in Charlotte, North Carolina.
As the funds faltered, Merrill sought to protect itself by seizing the assets that were used as collateral for its loans. JPMorgan planned to sell assets linked to its credit lines before reaching agreement with Bear Stearns to unwind the loan, people with knowledge of the negotiations said yesterday.
Bear Stearns was still in talks late yesterday with creditors to the funds to rescue the funds, said the people, who declined to be identified because the negotiations are private.
Russell Sherman, a Bear Stearns spokesman, and Jessica Oppenheim, a spokeswoman for Merrill, declined to comment.
`Pretty Ugly'
Merrill's decision yesterday to accept bids on $800 million of bonds it took as collateral for its loans further stifled trading in CDO securities, said David Castillo, who trades asset- backed, commercial-mortgage and CDO bonds in San Francisco at Further Lane Securities.
``Nobody wants to look at the truth right now because the truth is pretty ugly,'' Castillo said. ``Where people are willing to bid and where people have them marked are two different places.''
The perceived risk of holding Bear Stearns bonds jumped to a three-month high, according to traders betting on the creditworthiness of companies in the credit-default swaps market.
Contracts based on $10 million of its bonds rose $5,800 to $45,500, according to composite prices from London-based CMA Datavision. An increase in the five-year contracts suggests deterioration in the perception of credit quality. Contracts on Merrill jumped $4,700 to $33,000, CMA prices show.
Long-Term Capital
Shares of Bear Stearns fell for a fourth day, declining 19 cents to $143.01 at 9:32 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The stock was down 12 percent this year before today, compared with the 0.4 percent advance of the Standard & Poor's 500 Financials Index. Merrill dropped 20 cents to $87.48 and Citigroup fell 13 cents to $53.31.
The reaction to the Bear Stearns situation is reminiscent of Long-Term Capital Management LP, which lost $4.6 billion in 1998.
Lenders including Merrill and Bear Stearns met and agreed to take a stake in the Greenwich, Connecticut-based fund and slowly sold the assets to limit the impact of its collapse.
``We're not surprised to find the principal circle of players is pretty interconnected,'' said Roy Smith, professor of finance at New York University Stern School of Business and former head of Goldman's London office. ``What we're looking for is whether the interconnection creates a negative domino effect: Whether Hedge Fund A creates a problem for other hedge funds, which in turn creates a problem for the prime brokers that are lending to them.''
To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at mpittman@bloomberg.net .
 
A lot of dealing and wheeling going on right now on Wall Street and specially at Bear. On the bright side, we learn lot about CDO the last few days.

Bear Stearns Staves Off Collapse of 2 Hedge Funds
By VIKAS BAJAJ and JULIE CRESWELL
Published: June 21, 2007

The high-stakes game of brinksmanship began early yesterday on Wall Street, and continued throughout the day. Bankers traded telephone calls, frenetically negotiating the fate of two hedge funds.
Skip to next paragraph

All wanted to avoid a fire sale in the troubled mortgage-securities market, but at the same time, not get stuck with an exploding liability that could result in steep losses. The day ended with deals that appeared to have forestalled a meltdown. But questions remained about how successful they were and whether they had merely delayed the inevitable.

As the morning unfolded, lenders to two hedge funds at a unit of Bear Stearns, the investment bank, tried to ascertain what they could expect if they auctioned off mortgage securities with a face value of up to $2 billion. The solicitations were hastily withdrawn when investors reacted with little enthusiasm. But by the end of the day, some of the less-risky securities did change hands.

At the same time, several lenders, including JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, reached deals with Bear Stearns that forestalled a need to sell securities in the open market. It appeared that some lenders pulled back over concerns about the effect that a large liquidation would have on bond prices and investor confidence. While the securities involved represent a fraction of the market, a liquidation could have forced a bigger sell-off while setting a lower price.

One lender, Merrill Lynch & Company, moved ahead with plans to auction $850 million in collateral it had seized from the Bear funds, according to people briefed on the matter. And Deutsche Bank was said to be shopping $600 million in assets.

Concern over the Bear funds, along with a drop in energy stocks and uptick in yields, helped drive down stocks yesterday. The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index fell 20.86 points, to 1,512.84 , and the Dow Jones industrial average fell 146 points, to 13,489.42.

In the last week, escalating problems at the Bear Stearns High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leveraged Fund and a related fund have jarred investors into confronting systemic risks in the once booming market for bonds that are backed by mortgages to homeowners with weak, or subprime, credit. Last year, more than $483 billion of such bonds were issued, up 5 percent from 2005.

The deal that JP Morgan Chase reached with Bear Stearns Asset Management allowed it to sell $400 million collateral back to the hedge funds for cash, according to people briefed on the matter. It was not clear what price the two banks agreed to.

Goldman Sachs and Bank of America reached similar deals, though details remained unclear. Also unclear is what price the assets will eventually fetch for the Bear funds and what types of losses investors, who have been unable to redeem their investments since May, will face.

The securities causing the greatest concern within the Bear Stearns funds are known as collateralized debt obligations, or C.D.O.'s. Run by portfolio managers, these complex instrument are akin to mutual funds in that they buy stakes in a variety of bonds backed by mortgages.

They often invest in the riskiest portion of the bonds, usually with a hundreds of millions or billions in borrowed money. Some simply buy stakes in other C.D.O.'s. About $316 billion in C.D.O.'s specializing in mortgages were issued last year, up from $178 billion in 2005.

The leveraged fund at Bear Stearns, which is 10 months old, made a particularly big bet on these C.D.O.'s. But that strategy soured as more homeowners fell behind on loan payments and foreclosures surged. In many regions, home prices are falling and the number of properties for sale are growing.

Traders and industry executives who saw lists of C.D.O.'s on offer from the Bear Stearns funds say that even as the manager of the funds, Ralph Cioffi, bought some protection against a deteriorating housing market, on balance his investments seem to be based on a belief that the subprime market would not crumble, or at least not soon.

"This is some of the more aggressive stuff that has been issued in the last couple of years and is not indicative of what most people have been invested in," said a portfolio manager who did not want to speak for attribution because his firm may make bids on some of the assets.

He said it would take time — perhaps several days — for potential buyers to drill down into some of the more complex securities in order to value them before any bids could be prepared. From 33 to 45 percent of the $2 billion in C.D.O.'s on offer by the funds early yesterday were investments in other C.D.O.'s, according to officials who have seen the bid lists.
To continue, read http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/business/21bonds.html
 
Merill liquidated only some of the psitions in the market. Well that was a panic button Merill wanted to test how the marktes will behanve. The drama went well and the "dance of the Bear" to the tunes of CDOs was good.
Bear did some damage control. I hope the market stabilizes again.
 
I listened to the conference call by Bear's CFO. It was quite interesting and insightful. The CFO was frank about the loss and damages. He pointed out improvements on liquidation, enhancement, financing funds, etc. We'll see how it goes from here.
 
I also lintened the call.. somehow i felt that the trouble is deep. .. i mean he was not answering the important question and it seems to me that he was pre rehearsed. well i still think that someone is gonna blow up in coming months becuase this thing is not going to get quiet if the interest rates are not cut.. anyways .. just my opinion...

besides i am not sure what is gonna happen to the home sector in US..
 
Back
Top