- Joined
- 9/23/13
- Messages
- 7
- Points
- 13
So a little background:
- graduated in 2010 with 4 years finance degree from Melbourne University, average 87/100
- excellent grades for all maths/quants subjects I took
- has been working in a boutique investment fund (equity) for the last 2.5 years, career does not really go anywhere, I do not expect to stay in this job for long, will look for new job soon
- completed all three levels of CFA
- quite limited programming/ maths background (took some subjects about them back in uni, but I would not say that my knowledge is deep)
thinking to do master next year but I have a hard time deciding whether to apply for plain vanilla msc finance or economics (thinking of program in LSE, Oxford, Imperial) or quant finance program in the US
My heart says quant finance:
pros:
- I like mathematics. Indeed I often regretted that I took finance as undergraduate degree since it is not quant enough.
cons:
- I read that it is getting harder to get a job as a quant due to the glut of people with MFE degree
- more expensive than vanilla degree
- skillset developed is very specialised and is unlikely to be relevant for jobs outside quant field
- I do not have yet the required math and programming prerequisites so I have to study for these on top of my full time job
while the vanilla msc finance is safer:
pros:
- more generalist skills, could work in more areas
- cheaper
- I already have the necessary prerequisites to apply
cons:
- In my honours year I already did quite advanced theoretical finance and wrote a thesis (did not enjoy them too much), plus I completed CFA as well, so I am not sure if what I will learn in these programs will overlap with what I already knew
In a nutshell, I want to get into quant finance, but based on my research I feel that plain vanilla msc finance/economics is safer. I guess if the job prospect of the quant finance program is equal or better than say lse msc finance, then I will most likely go for quant finance, but apparently it is not so ? Thoughts ?
thank you
- graduated in 2010 with 4 years finance degree from Melbourne University, average 87/100
- excellent grades for all maths/quants subjects I took
- has been working in a boutique investment fund (equity) for the last 2.5 years, career does not really go anywhere, I do not expect to stay in this job for long, will look for new job soon
- completed all three levels of CFA
- quite limited programming/ maths background (took some subjects about them back in uni, but I would not say that my knowledge is deep)
thinking to do master next year but I have a hard time deciding whether to apply for plain vanilla msc finance or economics (thinking of program in LSE, Oxford, Imperial) or quant finance program in the US
My heart says quant finance:
pros:
- I like mathematics. Indeed I often regretted that I took finance as undergraduate degree since it is not quant enough.
cons:
- I read that it is getting harder to get a job as a quant due to the glut of people with MFE degree
- more expensive than vanilla degree
- skillset developed is very specialised and is unlikely to be relevant for jobs outside quant field
- I do not have yet the required math and programming prerequisites so I have to study for these on top of my full time job
while the vanilla msc finance is safer:
pros:
- more generalist skills, could work in more areas
- cheaper
- I already have the necessary prerequisites to apply
cons:
- In my honours year I already did quite advanced theoretical finance and wrote a thesis (did not enjoy them too much), plus I completed CFA as well, so I am not sure if what I will learn in these programs will overlap with what I already knew
In a nutshell, I want to get into quant finance, but based on my research I feel that plain vanilla msc finance/economics is safer. I guess if the job prospect of the quant finance program is equal or better than say lse msc finance, then I will most likely go for quant finance, but apparently it is not so ? Thoughts ?
thank you