All these numbers are insane
Of course, $85 in NM and NY are different things. A lot depends on your lifestyle. The biggest difference is probably in Real Estate

Check how much it would cost you to buy/rent a similar house in NYC.
Also, find the numbers for Albuquerque, then just use a simple formula
Your_$85K
--------------------------- X Cost_in_NY = Your_$$_Worth_in_NY
Cost_in_Albuquerque
That way you get an idea of how much you need to support your lifestyle.
Regarding incomes. They go up directly proportional to your performance. If you don't perform well, they fire you right away

If you perform well, you might get a raise.
That formula is what these websites do. Except in addition to real estate, they also consider the food, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. But since we're all analysts here, let's investigate their model. I hypothesize that their model takes the relative costs of these areas and the percentages they should represent in the median budget, then increase someone's entire income by that amount.
Let's test this theory.
One of the models (from CNN Money) gave this breakdown:
Groceries will cost: 39.136% more
Housing will cost: 253.755% more
Utilities will cost: 63.432% more
Transportation will cost: 15.658% more
Healthcare will cost: 28.23% more
If I take my current costs and multiply by these conversion factors:
Food: 6,000 to 8,340
Housing: 10,800 to 38,124
Utilities: 1,272 to 2,073
Transportation: 14,112 to 16,370
Healthcare: 4,800 to 6,144
Total: 36,984 to 71,051
This is an increase of 91%. If I take $85,511 and multiply by 191%, I get $164,180...Their model says I need $174,490. Given the variations I may have from the median family in my budget, this seems like a reasonable error. We will fail to reject my hypothesis.
I would say that 30% of my income is disposable and most of that goes to investing for retirement. 30% of 85k going to retirement is really just $25.5k a year and it's not "fair" to say that this number must increase by the same percentage as housing and utilities. So while I could say that housing, utilities, transportation, healthcare, and food would have to go up by a certain percentage in order to maintain my current lifestyle, the disposable income would not. Therefore, a better model would have discretionary spending as fixed with mandatory spending as a linear relationship.
Now what about the other failures of this model? It yields a delta of $34,067, however I seriously doubt my transportation costs will remain that high given that I will not need two cars living in Manhattan. A metro ticket is what, $76/mo x 2 for my wife and myself netting $1,824/yr. Of course there are taxis, but not $14,546 worth I hope. Also, I do not NEED an 1800sqft house with 2 car garage and a 1/2 acre of land. I am forced to take it at a cost of $900/mo here because the military stipulates where I will live and they attempt to meet the needs of the average officer. So, how much would it cost for a nice 800-1000sqft condo? Is it really $3,177/mo? Just skimming craigslist, it seems that $2400 is a more accurate number.
So integrating $28,800 for housing and ~$3,000 for transportation yields
Total: 36,984 to 48,357
This gives a delta of $11,373. $85k + $11k = $96k which seems reasonable given what I've heard through the grapevine. That means that any bonuses can be directly invested into retirement.