Hi,
I've been accepted to UCLA and UCSD. I'm waitlisted for Berkeley and I haven't heard anything from USC yet.
At UCSD I was offered a $55,000 fellowship and their tuition is $65,000, while at UCLA I was offered no financial support and their tuition is $75,000. What would be the better decision if it came down to the two schools? I know the average salary for UCLA MFE graduates entering the workforce is $100,000. UCSD doesn't have those statistics because their finance program is relatively new but their MBA program has an average salary of $75,000. I've read that the bump from going to top schools wears off over time. Is a $65,000 discount up front worth it? For what it's worth, the two schools seem almost identical as far as curriculum.
Thanks,
Charles
I've been accepted to UCLA and UCSD. I'm waitlisted for Berkeley and I haven't heard anything from USC yet.
At UCSD I was offered a $55,000 fellowship and their tuition is $65,000, while at UCLA I was offered no financial support and their tuition is $75,000. What would be the better decision if it came down to the two schools? I know the average salary for UCLA MFE graduates entering the workforce is $100,000. UCSD doesn't have those statistics because their finance program is relatively new but their MBA program has an average salary of $75,000. I've read that the bump from going to top schools wears off over time. Is a $65,000 discount up front worth it? For what it's worth, the two schools seem almost identical as far as curriculum.
Thanks,
Charles
Last edited: