I find myself hostile to unpaid internships, and I believe his experience is quite reasonably focused on finance. I know of interns who got paid more than their fathers who had 'real' jobs.
The media industries of course are worst. Some firms would literally cease to function if unpaid interns weren't there, and the chances of getting a job after is small. One of my godchildren is up for an internship in NY to do photography in a big name firm, the rough equivalent of (say) DE Shaw Apparently they expect him to live and work in NY for a year for nothing, and this is quite standard. My family can stump up for that now, if that had been me at 25 they'd have just laughed and asked if I also needed a Jet Fighter for my school project, it would have been that absurd.
Unpaid internships are thus a barrier to social mobility and mean that rich dumb kids get better opportunities than poor smart ones. That's bad for the economy, even before one chooses an ethical position.
There's also a 'respect' term.
The most honest respect anyone can give you is to pay for your work. Free labour will be squandered, basic economics tells us that "free" resources are rarely used efficiently.
As a headhunter with a high profile I see part of my job as advising people not to make the same dumb mistakes i've made over the years, and although in some biological measures I was smarter at 23 than now at 49.8, I could outsmart that kid wholesale.
Anthony made a good choice, not everyone does, I turned down a paid job at DE Shaw because they seemed like some tinpot little outfit, they kept bugging me for a while than gave up. This was not my best decision (or my worst). Imagine having to do multiple unpaid internships, most young people and/or parents would run out of cash forcing them to take some shit job.
Anthony (probably correctly) sees himself as big enough to take care of himself, good, and I entirely agree that when a relationship is vaguely amongst free adults the state has little useful role except for dishonesty and coercion.
Although Anthony may be correct that the job he got was that way, but I have to ask whether this is the case of changing which person got hired, not whether someone got hired. The difference is important.
As the plague of unpaid internships spreads, more firms will see free labour for doing grunt work, and it may become the norm, going back to media for a moment the trend there is to pay for internships. Yes you read that right, if people are prepared to work for free for the carrot of a possibility of a good job it follows that some will actually pay (or their parents will).
If it becomes the norm, jobs will increasingly be allocated on the basis of parental wealth.
Anthony talks of the marines, but they are paid, and boot camp recruits are paid more than officers are in some other armies.
The UK used to choose its officers on the basis of parental wealth as recently as the 1960s.
Britain used to have an empire bigger than the next two or three put together.
It doesn't any more.
For various (not very good) reasons I find that these days I am speaking to the media quite often about why we as an industry aren't quite as evil as they think. One shining point is that compared to most lines of work it is a meritocracy. Not completely of course, but better than most.
So should you be allowed to work for free ?
That's a genuinely hard question, my first response is "yes, but no one should be allowed to hire you".