Hello,
This is motivated by some of the recent threads on the board, and the Tim Grant interview I finally got around to reading.
I have read some interviews and different threads about the trading field. Obviously it is becomming more quatitative by the day. My question is if the same division between quant and traders still exists at all or are most traders really quant traders? For instance is an mba in finance still enough to get a trading position in any area? And will it be a few years into the future? With the emergence of the mfe programs, it seems more and more quants are getting hired in traditional trading roles, typically filled by less quantitative mba grads.
While all trading can involve quantitative methods, which of the primary trading areas would you consider least quantitative and most likely to continue to hire from mba programs?
I know this question has been asked partially in different threads, but I think it would be nice to see a complete topic devoted to it.
Thanks.
This is motivated by some of the recent threads on the board, and the Tim Grant interview I finally got around to reading.
I have read some interviews and different threads about the trading field. Obviously it is becomming more quatitative by the day. My question is if the same division between quant and traders still exists at all or are most traders really quant traders? For instance is an mba in finance still enough to get a trading position in any area? And will it be a few years into the future? With the emergence of the mfe programs, it seems more and more quants are getting hired in traditional trading roles, typically filled by less quantitative mba grads.
While all trading can involve quantitative methods, which of the primary trading areas would you consider least quantitative and most likely to continue to hire from mba programs?
I know this question has been asked partially in different threads, but I think it would be nice to see a complete topic devoted to it.
Thanks.