- Joined
- 12/14/15
- Messages
- 128
- Points
- 38
I too am skeptical of that "study".
Conclusions of a non peer reviewed report are not "fact".
Purely on a prima facie basis, the number cited is beyond laughable. The report concludes that 250k+ reported cases, just from Aug 2 to Sep 2 are attributable to that event. Since the event was from August 7th to August 16th, and there is a lag between reported positive result and actual infection date, it would imply that about half of the total reported cases from the entire country is attributable to a single event in South Dakota.
I was only quoting a fact.
I do dispute that piece on NYP; the logic is somewhat flawed.
Conclusions of a non peer reviewed report are not "fact".
Purely on a prima facie basis, the number cited is beyond laughable. The report concludes that 250k+ reported cases, just from Aug 2 to Sep 2 are attributable to that event. Since the event was from August 7th to August 16th, and there is a lag between reported positive result and actual infection date, it would imply that about half of the total reported cases from the entire country is attributable to a single event in South Dakota.