Poll: QuantNet ranking layout mockup

[Andy Nguyen]

Need your input. We've been working to update the ranking layout which has been the same for the past dozen years.
There are 2 layouts here.
(A) is with a small image on the right. Simple but with some graphic element to visually differentiate programs a bit.
(B) is with a larger image on the left. The graphic may take attention away from the info and that specific format is a bit harder to get them to work well on mobile device.

We still need to arrange the data a bit but it's essentially the same data presented in the current ranking.
Do let us know what you think. Thank you.

 

[kombuchalover]

I’d go with whatever is easier for a mobile device so (A)

 

[Andy Nguyen]

Looks like the vote is overwhelmingly for option A. If you haven't voted, please do and let me know any suggestion about the layout before we finalize it.

 

[weab]

for A, maybe you could do a picture of the school logo instead of the current picture.

 

[maitreya]

A

 

[Andy Nguyen]

A sneakpeek of our new ranking layout.

 

[Andy Nguyen]

I have updated the 2024 ranking with the new layout. There will be typo or placeholder links that lead to pages to be updated.
Please report if you encounter any issue on your phone or desktop.

 

[poilot]

The new layout looks amazing!

 

[ajjjw]

New layout looks great!

Quick question: it seems like cornell, nyu math fin, columbia MAFN, and MIT all have the exact same total score but cornell and nyu are tied at 7 while columbia mafn and mit are tied at 9. I seem to remember, before the update, the programs at 9 receiving a score of 82 this year whereas the programs at 7 had an 83… this is nitpicking forsure, but did these scores somehow change? and if not, why do rankings differ for these programs with the same total score?

 

[Andy Nguyen]

New layout looks great!

Quick question: it seems like cornell, nyu math fin, columbia MAFN, and MIT all have the exact same total score but cornell and nyu are tied at 7 while columbia mafn and mit are tied at 9. I seem to remember, before the update, the programs at 9 receiving a score of 82 this year whereas the programs at 7 had an 83… this is nitpicking forsure, but did these scores somehow change? and if not, why do rankings differ for these programs with the same total score?

You are absolutely correct. It was some copy/paste error which is now corrected.

 

[Andy Nguyen]

I'm open to any feedback or suggestion for improvement. Please let me know if you have any issue viewing it on your phone or computer.